Air Supported vs Permanent Structures

For those planning the infrastructure of tennis centers, the choice between air supported and permanent structures is critical. Here we explore the advantages of air supported structures, positioning them as a strategic and often preferable alternative to their permanent counterparts.

Capital Cost

Air Supported Structures: These structures stand out for their cost-efficiency. The investment required is less daunting, dependent on the size of the facility, and the selection of liner and equipment, making them a budget-friendly option.

Permanent Structures: In contrast, constructing a permanent facility demands a higher initial capital outlay, influenced by the facility's size, design complexity, and the quality of building materials.

Operating Cost

Air Supported Structures: Despite potentially higher utility costs per usage hour, the seasonal nature of these structures—typically active for 5 to 6 months—can mean overall lower operating costs annually.

Permanent Structures: Permanent facilities incur significant operating expenses year-round, including staffing and utilities, which can add up over the facility's continuous 12-month operation.

Seasonal Implications

Air Supported Structures: These structures excel in seasonal adaptability, offering covered courts in winter and converting to outdoor courts in summer, ensuring year-round utility and maximized investment.

Permanent Structures: They may be preferred during winter but often face programming and utilization challenges in the summer, leading to potential inefficiency.

Life Cycle

Air Supported Structures: The bubble fabric of these structures is robust, with a life span of 15 to 20 years, reliant on diligent maintenance and UV protection measures.

Permanent Structures: While they have a longer estimated life span of 25 to 35 years, the extended life comes with sustained maintenance and operational costs.

Consumer Opinions

Air Supported Structures: Players endorse the seasonal outdoor play option and often report a more enjoyable playing experience, citing better air quality and temperature control compared to permanent structures.

Permanent Structures: Although they offer a stable environment, the lack of seasonal open-air play can be a downside for some consumers.

Operating Considerations

Air Supported Structures: They are lauded for their flexibility but are sometimes limited by codes that prevent use as general gathering places, slightly narrowing program diversity.

Permanent Structures: These require intensive scheduling efforts to remain active during off-peak seasons, which can be a logistical challenge.

In sum, air supported structures often present a superior option for tennis centers, particularly when considering budget constraints, seasonal versatility, and consumer satisfaction. They provide a strategic and adaptable solution that can be tailored to the specific needs of a community or organization, making them an increasingly popular choice in the planning of recreational facilities.